Rhetorical Technique Essay Sample free essay sample

Logos. Ethos. and Pathos represent the three rhetorical techniques. which conveying balance to a paper by act uponing the audience’s response to logic. moralss. and emotion. Logos consists of the facts and illustrations that back up an statement. supplying a supportive anchor to a paper. Ethos pertains to the moralss of a paper. by mentioning the credibleness of the writer. therefore converting the readers to be more open-minded to the new thoughts presented. Pathos uses emotion to assist the writer relate to the audience and force the point farther. King wrote â€Å"The Letter from Birmingham Jail† in contrast to the Clergymen’s â€Å"A Call for Unity. † and used all three rhetorical techniques: Son. ethos. and poignancy. Although all techniques provided the indispensable edifice blocks for a all-around essay. yet the usage of Son was most effectual for it added ground. and exemplified a intent that appealed to the Clergymen in a manner that showed author ization. We will write a custom essay sample on Rhetorical Technique Essay Sample or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page cognition. and regard. In 1963 the eight white Clergymans from Birmingham addressed the tribunals as being fair in their missive â€Å"A Call for Unity† . They stated that King’s presentations as prematurely. and utmost. furthermore that the dissenters themselves would â€Å"incite hatred and violence† ( 1 ) . The Clergymen so praised the constabulary who kept the peace. and urged the occupants of Birmingham to defy the protestors and withdraw support. ( Clergymen 1 ) Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. responded to the Clergymen with the â€Å"Letter from Birmingham Jail. † in which he stated that the organisations and the unfairness of the south brought him to the metropolis of Birmingham. King addressed that the protestors were treated unjustly by the tribunals and metropolis leaders ( King 1 ) . He acknowledged the fact that he put clocking into position ( King 2 ) . Then King references his letdown with the â€Å"white moderates† ( King 4 ) . King was surprised that the reverends had called him an extremist. saying that he was merely endeavoring to make peace for both sides. King besides expressed his letdown t he reverends and the church saying that he was excessively optimistic. King addressed that the constabulary were moving non-violently in the public oculus but had a concealed docket to continue segregation ( King 7-8 ) . Last. King declares his hope for a hereafter that will acknowledge the good in these protests in the South. King incites authorization from the start of his statement to turn out to the Clergymen that he an equal. King provinces that the ground he is in Birmingham is because he and his co-workers were invited to compensate the unfairness inflicted by the tribunals ( King 1 ) . King addresses the Clergymen’s inquiry really early on in his missive with a straight-forward. simple reply to get down his missive with a strong point of position. King shows that he merely meant to assist the organisations that he is tied to. turn outing that he had a ground to be in Birmingham. Stating that he was invited shows that the community was in demand of alteration and that they were tired of the corrupt southern justness system. King’s cognition of the Torahs and the justness system grounds that the Birmingham constabularies were unprecedented when flexing the jurisprudence to convict the dissenters. King writes about how he was arrested without a license for protesting publically. even though he remained peaceable. and states that un-lawful apprehensions are illegal. King knew that a license is required for a non-immediate apprehension in Alabama ; he proves merely how unfair and corrupted the justness system in Birmingham was at the clip. While the Clergymen praised the constabulary for maintaining the peace in Birmingham. King addresses how this was from the position of a white adult male in the South. King used logical logical thinking with the facts of the jurisprudence to turn out that the constabulary were non how the Clergymen described. King respectfully besides corrected the Clergymen in his counter statement. while explicating it logically. maintaining it simple and to the point as a manner of easing the Clergymen into seeing his position on the protests in Birmingham. King addressed the unfairness of the metropolis leaders when they wouldn’t take part in â€Å"good religion negotiation† ( 35 ) . The Civil Rights Movement tried to make out to the community. but the leaders were non unfastened to their thoughts. un-like how the eight white Clergymen wrote they would be. By disregarding the offers from the Civil Rights Movement forced the organisations to protest publically to acquire their attending. The protests were peaceable and controlled. but dialogue would hold been faster and far more organized contradicting what the Clergymen stated. Even though the Clergymen did non compose a documented response to King. it’s assumed that they better understood the protestors and their cause. if the Clergymen still didn’t back up the motion. they didn’t act against it. The state was affected by this powerful missive on a greater graduated table as 1000000s of people read the words of Martin Luther King Jr. specifying the Civil Rights Movement in a manner that made it an undeniable force. King’s missive was the start of the Civil Rights Movement that contributed to the terminal of segregation. Work Cited: A Group of Clergymen. â€Å"Call for Unity. † Letter to Martin Luther King Jr. 12 April 1963. TeachingAmericanHistory. org. 18 August 2008. Web. 4 Martin Luther King Jr. â€Å"Letter from Birmingham Jail. † Letter to A Group of Clergyman. 16 April 1968. African Studies Center. University of Pennsylvania. 17 January 2008. Web. 4